A California non-compete agreement is used to prohibit an individual that is selling their company or leaving a partnership from continuing similar business activities. In California, non-compete agreements between employees and employers cannot be enforced, regardless of the occupation. The agreement ensures sellers of businesses will not continue to use the trade secrets, business methods, customer lists, and other sensitive information they are providing the new owner. In the same manner, a member of a partnership or LLC may also be restricted from operating a similar business after exiting.
Employers cannot enforce a non-compete agreement against an employee.
- Selling a business. Non-compete agreements can be administered to prevent a seller of an entity from operating in a similar field in the same geographic region.
- Dissolution of partnership or LLC. A member disassociating from a partnership or limited liability company may agree to enter into a non-compete agreement to refrain from carrying on a like business in the geographic area where the partnership or company operates.
- Employers and employees. A business owner cannot include a non-compete clause or agreement in an employment contract. No person can be restricted from working in their domain by written agreement unless provided otherwise by law.
California law does not state a time limit for non-compete agreements as they are generally unenforceable. However, should an exception apply, both 5-year and 10-year non-compete covenants have been deemed enforceable.
A non-compete agreement restricts a seller of a company or a member disassociating from a partnership or LLC from conducting a similar business in the area where the company or partnership operates. The agreement may be enforced provided the buyer of the company, or a member of the partnership or LLC (or any party with an interest or who has derived ownership to the company or partnership) continues to conduct business in that area.
In one case, the court approved a non-compete agreement that applied to the entire state of California as the plaintiff conducted business with companies located across all fifty-eight (58) counties in California.
- Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16601
- Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16602
- Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16602.5
- Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16600
- Hakenjos Hall Prof’l Servs., Inc. v. Bland, No. D067385, 2 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 2, 2016)
- Dent Mart Int’l, Inc. v. Iden Dental Supply, Inc., No. B253743, 32 (Cal. Ct. App. May. 20, 2015)
- Alliant Ins. Services, Inc. v. Gaddy, 159 Cal.App.4th 1292, 1305-06, 72 Cal. Rptr. 3d 259 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)
- Kolani v. Gluska, 64 Cal.App.4th 402, 407, 75 Cal. Rptr. 2d 257 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)
- Swenson v. File, 3 Cal.3d 389, 395, 475 P.2d 852 (Cal. 1970)
California Non-Disclosure Agreement: Used to ensure information exchanged between two (2) parties remains confidential.